Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #22906

    Yorick
    Participant

    Hi, buildings that use tags with lifecycle prefixes don’t seem to be rendered on OAM at the moment. I think you should at least render abandoned:building as it’s pretty widespread (100k+ uses) and useful in rural areas.
    Other prefixes (ruins: and disused:) are used much less but it might be useful to render them too.

    #22945
    ChristianK
    ChristianK
    Keymaster

    Hi,

    sorry for answering late.
    As far as I can see 97% of the “abandoned:building” have a simple “yes” as key.
    Hmm…

    Well, I can include this abandoned:building=yes in the tagmapping.
    However, I’m not shure that this will add real valuable informations to the map.

    Actually we have included bunkers and mines with attribute disused.

    Best regards
    Christian

    #23349

    Aragorn
    Participant

    I am not convinced that removing building tag for something that is a building is a correct tagging.

    And note that 100k+ is nearly nothing compared to 284 859 684 building=*,

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.