[JohnPercyParticipant]

At present banks are only rendered if they are mapped as nodes. This misses out buildings which have been mapped and marked as amenity=bank. Could you please include these in the next version?
It might also be worth considering including atm=atm_no transformed from atm=no (the default is to assume atm=yes) in such cases, though I admit I’ve not looked at the frequency of occurrence.

[ChristianKKeymaster]

Hi John,

JohnPercy wrote:

amenity=bank as way

Was a bug, Done

JohnPercy wrote:

including atm=atm_no transformed from atm=no

Actually we don’t have the “ATM” key at all.
Atm’s are rendered as amenity=atm (Node)
I would tagtransform atm=yes to amenity=atm (both node/way)
OK @John @tobias ?

ATM=NO – I don’t see any value for the maps with this tag (my opinion..)

Best regards
Christian

2 users thanked author for this post.

Tobias, JohnPercy

[JohnPercyParticipant]

Thanks for the amenity=bank for ways.
The atm tag is more complicated. For banks with no ATM facility, it is suggested in the wiki that they are tagged atm=no. The usefulness would be that that indicates no automated cash withdrawal available, often out of hours. atm=yes may be otherwise presumed for banks. In other words atm=yes is not recommended tagging for banks, only atm=no, if it applies
On that basis, you don’t want to transform atm=yes to amenity=atm as (a) it won’t catch many instances (b) it will miss the important, negative, ones. The only way I could see it being of use is with a tag ATM=atm_no.
But it’s just a thought.

[Author]

Posts