Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #41914
    JohnPercy
    JohnPercy
    Participant

    This proposed cycle route is appearing on the map as in existence already: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9686549#map=17/51.51265/-0.16070
    I’m looking particularly at N 51.51220°, W 000.16205° where there is no highway at all.
    I’m not sure what is causing this. Or is it just that the “proposed” tags have only recently been added?
    [Edit: I now see that route was changed to proposed:route 24 days ago.]

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #41917
    ChristianK
    ChristianK
    Keymaster

    The superroute above is still “bicycle”

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #41935
    JohnPercy
    JohnPercy
    Participant

    Do you think it correct that the members of the super route inherit its properties? Of so, there can never be any proposed routes that are part of the super route. Just asking.

    #41945
    ChristianK
    ChristianK
    Keymaster

    Well, Priority of Routes is one of the weak points of the Perl-Scripts that resolve the Hike/Cycle relations, thats a bug from beginning deep in the structure and not easy to solve.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.