[Tapio]

Peak names and elevation. Above and below symbol. Does DY have no effect here? I struggle to get the peak name (above) closer to the symbol.

View post on imgur.com

				<rule e="node" k="*" v="*" zoom-min="15">
					<caption symbol-id="id_peak" position="above" dy="1" k="name" font-family="sans_serif" font-style="bold_italic" font-size="13" fill="#303030" stroke="#ffffff" stroke-width="2.5" priority="415" text-transform="capitalize" text-wrap-width="120" />
					<caption symbol-id="id_peak" k="ele" dy="-1" position="below" font-family="sans_serif" font-size="11" fill="#303030" stroke="#ffffff" stroke-width="2" priority="414" />
				</rule>}

Tapiola MFV4+ theme for OAM Maps:
Releases - DL latest zip - Latest xml

[JohnPercy]

„dy“ is incompatible with position=“top“. Use one or the other (I think)

Voluntary and Velocity themes - https://voluntary.nichesite.org

3 Teilnehmer(n) gefällt dieser Beitrag

ChristianK, Tapio, Tobias

[Tapio]

Will check, first quick test wasn’t successful but I always don’t know the peak_dist value of specific peaks (pd_1 to pd_5). Anyone know a way? A you probably know they’re not in osm, but calculated by Christian.

rule e=“node“ k=“peak_dist“ v=“pd_1″

I can of course use v=“*“ for testing. Not sure anyway if I want distinct rules for each pd level.

Tapiola MFV4+ theme for OAM Maps:
Releases - DL latest zip - Latest xml

[Tobias]

You’re looking for this list:
https://geo.dianacht.de/topo/topographic_isolation_viefinderpanoramas.txt

And here you find how the Dominanz value is grouped into pd1 to pd5:
https://www.openandromaps.org/oam-forums/topic/anzeige-berggipfel-in-elevate-le/page/3#post-2099

Developer of Elevate mapstyle

2 Teilnehmer(n) gefällt dieser Beitrag

Tapio, ChristianK

[Autor]

Beiträge