-
Beiträge
-
Hello.
I just downloaded the newly published map of Colombia.
I wanted to ask you about the update date of the natural=peak, the date of the data. I’m finding some really strange behavior regarding the correspondence between POI position and rendered position on the map, POIs and the map do not match with natural=peak, which had been repositioned about a month ago. The download page says that for Colombia the OSM data is from 30/03/2026, However, it just so happens that a month ago I changed the position of 2 natural peaks, and these appear on the map in their previous position, while the POIs are in their current position.
Annex 2 natural=peak so that you can carry out the corresponding tests and verify that the POI position and icon on the map do not coincide.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6836094385
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11117089570
Also, a screenshot; the position of the blue cursor is the current position and the POI is there, and you’ll also see the position of the Alto La Bodega icon.
P.S. I’ve been using OAM for several years, and there’s always been a progression: the increasing weight of the Masforge between publication dates. This is the first time I’ve seen a decrease in weight. has decreased from 1.4 GB (January) to 1.2 GB (April).@afgb1977
Hallo,
Schlecht….
Die Peaks/Saddles werden von MaxBe incl der SaddleDirections und Peak-Isolation von MaxBe zur Verfügung gestellt.
Irgenwas ist bei der Generierung schief gelaufen.
Die Peaks in den POIs stammen aus den OSM Daten direkt.
Deswegen die Diskrepanz.Ich check das mal…
LG, Christian
Gefunden: Mein Script zum Einarbeiten der Daten von MaxBe in die OSM-Daten hatte einen Fehler und ist leise, vorbei am Prüfalgorithmus, gecrashed…..
Danke für den Hinweis, ich lasse Colombia noch mal durchlaufen.
LG Christian
1 Teilnehmer(n) gefällt dieser Beitrag
- Sie müssen angemeldet sein, um zu diesem Thema eine Antwort verfassen zu können.