- Beiträge
Gibt es für die Elevate 4.40RC_Winter bereits eine Legende ?
Es gilt weiterhin die vorhandene Legende, da sich bezüglich der Winter-Routen offensichtlich nichts geändert hat.
Legende als Anhang.1 Teilnehmer(n) gefällt dieser Beitrag
Kurzer Status zu Elevate 4.40RC:
Hab gestern die Wintersport-Tags in der neuen Elevate.xml ergänzt und mit der aktuellen Alpen-Karte getestet.
Die Wintertouren werden wie bisher dargestellt, allerdings sind die bekannten Probleme, vor allem Doubletten, immer noch vorhanden.
lg PeterHi, something weird happened to my account and I missed several months‘ posts. What is the current state of the winter theme? Has it been integrated in Elevate or is it a separate theme? What is the latest version?
I’m testing Elevate4.40RC_Winter.xml_.zip (under Cartograph Pro) but it doesn’t show any map. Am I missing something?
Thanks
Hi solitone,
The official released version of the so called „winter-fork“ is here:
http://www.senotto.de/index.html?Tipps%20und%20Tricks&Tipps_Tricks/GPS/OAM_Winter/OAM_Winter.html
Basis is the Elevate/Elements 4.3.3.1
Testet on a Windows10-PC with „cruiser“ and on a Android-Smartphone with „Oruxmaps“.
I used the actual OpenAndroMaps „Alps“ map.
If you want to test with the release-candidate 4.4RC, to be sure to test with the actual version, I’ve attached it.
If you have problems with other software then cruiser or Oruxmaps, prease give me more details.
regards PeterCartograph Pro
I’ve now tried to test Cartograph lite, but I didn’t find a way to setup the layer „Wintersport“.
1 Teilnehmer(n) gefällt dieser Beitrag
Ok, version 4.3.3.1 works, but RC version doesn’t.
Cartograph Pro
I’ve now tried to test Cartograph lite, but I didn’t find a way to setup the layer „Wintersport“.
To choose the layer click the brush icon and choose the map layer stile entry. Then from the drop down menu you can select the wintersport layer.
Thanks!
choose the map layer stile entry
OK, I thought that it should work this way, but this functionality is only available in the PRO-Version.
Ok, version 4.3.3.1 works, but RC version doesn’t.
Does the regular Elevate 4.4.0RC work with Cartograph? Are you using version 1 or 2?
I also tried the lite version, I can choose the overlays, but they don’t seem to work (one time it worked, the other times not).Developer of Elevate mapstyle
Does the regular Elevate 4.4.0RC work with Cartograph
I’ve got a PRO-Version from Harald Meyer and did some testing:
– Elevate4.331 works fine, also with winter-extensions *1*
– Elevate4.40RC doesn’t work, shows only the map 🙁
*1* Cartograph does „zooming“ the winter-routes, even though I’ve disabled zooming– Elevate4.40RC doesn’t work, shows only the map
So no difference between Cartograph 2 Lite and Pro.
Strangely this seems not be connected to any changes in overlays (there were none), but some minor bugs – seems like I didn’t validate the last changes – and there were a lot. And Cartograph is reacting strangely to them, no other app I tested the RC had problems (OruxMaps, Locus, Cruiser). But at least I found some things which needed correction, and uploaded a new RC which works for me now (in Cartograph 2 Lite).Developer of Elevate mapstyle
1 Teilnehmer(n) gefällt dieser Beitrag
from a pm, may be it is corrected:
Im RC XML File hat sich ein Fehler eingeschlichen („dy“ is 2 Mal definiert in Zeile 3352):
####
<pathText k=“ref“ font-style=“normal“ font-size=“10″ dy=“-2″ fill=“#777777″ stroke=“#E5FFFFFF“ stroke-width=“2.5″ dy=“-2.5″
####Yes, that was one of them, all corrected as noted above.
Developer of Elevate mapstyle
1 Teilnehmer(n) gefällt dieser Beitrag
Corrected and tested this small changes in my winter-styles: works 🙂
All the files with some small changes in the legend:
http://www.senotto.de/index.html?Tipps%20und%20Tricks&Tipps_Tricks/GPS/OAM_Winter/OAM_Winter.htmla happy new year to all of you !!!
Peter
Ok, I tested latest RC on Cartograph 2.5.9 and it also works now, thanks!
Still, piste ways are misaligned to piste areas, as shown in the attached pic. Does this happen also in other apps?
piste ways are misaligned to piste areas
This behaviour could be a point for discussion and possibly improvement.
The considerations, why I have implemented it that way, are:
==> piste ways are sometimes tagged along normal ways, so it makes sense to display them with an offset.
==> piste areas are normally tagged on big ares, p.e. on meadows between forests,
there ist no need for an offset, but this could be implemented easily.
To demonstrate this 2 examples from the Garmisch ski-resort.
lg Peter
- Sie müssen angemeldet sein, um zu diesem Thema eine Antwort verfassen zu können.