Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #47285
    Juanjo
    Participant

    Hi,

    I see that hiking routes with tag state=proposed are showing in the map. I think that it is probably better to remove them as, if they are at proposal state, they probably wouldn’t be sign posted yet.

    Regards

    #47288
    ChristianK
    Keymaster

    Most of these proposed routes (as far as I know) are in Scandinavia.
    Well, without these Routes there are only a very few ones on the map.

    However, I’m aware of this problem – a possible solution would be to introduce (again, onother) Layer to switch these Routes visible/not-visible.

    BUT
    We are now showing mtb/cycle/hike routes with highest priority so I would have to add (in worst case) 3 Flags to each way and this will definitly blow up the 15 tags-Limit.

    So…….
    The decicssion is weather kill these proposed routes in preprozessing or not….

    #47292
    Juanjo
    Participant

    I know a few in Spain, well I am the one who mapped them ;-)

    The proposal is coming from a local alpine club but now it is in the hands of the municipality to make it happen, and … nothing moves. This is why I want to remove them from the map, they are not sign posted and I not not want that people, looking at the map, think that they would find something there.

    As an example, Waymarked Trails do not show them.

    #47293
    ChristianK
    Keymaster

    Maybe @Tobias or @Michael have an idea how to deal with this issue..

    maybe an addidional “network” value like

    ProposedMtbNetwork = pmn
    ProposedWalkingNetwork = pwn
    ProposedCycleNetwork = pcn

    However, a proposed NationalRoute would then have a very low priority….

    OK – ideas are welcome as long as amount of tags per way do not increase.

    #47294
    Tobias
    Keymaster

    The decicssion is weather kill these proposed routes in preprozessing or not….

    I would kill them :-) in the good old OSM tradition “mapping what’s on the ground”… and a proposed route is something different than e.g. highway=construction, which is often already quite visible in reality.

    Developer of Elevate mapstyle

    #47310
    ChristianK
    Keymaster

    Its not that easy with the proposed routes.

    The EV1 has been finished many years ago, people use it for a long time.
    Nevertheless someone has tagged some sub-relations in Norway as state=proposed
    In fact 1/3rd of the route through Norway isnt shown on Cycle-Maps.

    Same for EV7 in Sweden aso, etc…


    well

    • This reply was modified 4 months, 3 weeks ago by ChristianK.
    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #47317
    ChristianK
    Keymaster

    Ok, the routes tagged as state=proposed are removed from the map.
    However, they still do exist as pmn/pcn/pwn at lowest priority in the map

    So

    
    hiking:11053756:pwn:PA:Poo - Arenas:no:::::::0
    hiking:11058405:pwn:CA:Carreña - Asiegu:no:::::::0
    hiking:11060880:pwn:PP:Puertas - Pandiellu:no:::::::0
    hiking:11061349:pwn:IP:Inguanzo - Poo:no:::::::0
    hiking:11063879:pwn:OCLM:Ortigueru - Canales - La Molina:no:::::::0
    hiking:11063992:pwn:BI:Berodia - Inguanzo:no:::::::0
    hiking:11064793:pwn:TA:Tielve - Arenas:no:::::::0
    hiking:11068590:pwn:PBST:Poncebos - Bulnes - Sotres - Tielve:no:::::::0
    hiking:11074845:pwn:AC:Arangas - Carreña:no:::::::0
    hiking:11082491:pwn:PCP:Poo - Camarmeña - Poncebos:no:::::::0
    

    .. are no longer on regular map with Elevate from next update on.

    • This reply was modified 4 months, 3 weeks ago by ChristianK.
    2 users thanked author for this post.
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.