[Juanjo]

Hi,

I see that hiking routes with tag state=proposed are showing in the map. I think that it is probably better to remove them as, if they are at proposal state, they probably wouldn’t be sign posted yet.

Regards

[ChristianK]

Most of these proposed routes (as far as I know) are in Scandinavia.
Well, without these Routes there are only a very few ones on the map.

However, I’m aware of this problem – a possible solution would be to introduce (again, onother) Layer to switch these Routes visible/not-visible.

BUT
We are now showing mtb/cycle/hike routes with highest priority so I would have to add (in worst case) 3 Flags to each way and this will definitly blow up the 15 tags-Limit.

So…….
The decicssion is weather kill these proposed routes in preprozessing or not….

[Juanjo]

I know a few in Spain, well I am the one who mapped them 😉

The proposal is coming from a local alpine club but now it is in the hands of the municipality to make it happen, and … nothing moves. This is why I want to remove them from the map, they are not sign posted and I not not want that people, looking at the map, think that they would find something there.

As an example, Waymarked Trails do not show them.

[ChristianK]

Maybe @Tobias or @Michael have an idea how to deal with this issue..

maybe an addidional “network” value like

ProposedMtbNetwork = pmn
ProposedWalkingNetwork = pwn
ProposedCycleNetwork = pcn

However, a proposed NationalRoute would then have a very low priority….

OK – ideas are welcome as long as amount of tags per way do not increase.

[Tobias]

ChristianK wrote:

The decicssion is weather kill these proposed routes in preprozessing or not….

I would kill them 🙂 in the good old OSM tradition “mapping what’s on the ground”… and a proposed route is something different than e.g. highway=construction, which is often already quite visible in reality.

Developer of Elevate mapstyle

[ChristianK]

Its not that easy with the proposed routes.

The EV1 has been finished many years ago, people use it for a long time.
Nevertheless someone has tagged some sub-relations in Norway as state=proposed
In fact 1/3rd of the route through Norway isnt shown on Cycle-Maps.

Same for EV7 in Sweden aso, etc…

…
well
…

1 user thanked author for this post.

Tobias

[ChristianK]

Ok, the routes tagged as state=proposed are removed from the map.
However, they still do exist as pmn/pcn/pwn at lowest priority in the map

So

hiking:11053756:pwn:PA:Poo - Arenas:no:::::::0
hiking:11058405:pwn:CA:Carreña - Asiegu:no:::::::0
hiking:11060880:pwn:PP:Puertas - Pandiellu:no:::::::0
hiking:11061349:pwn:IP:Inguanzo - Poo:no:::::::0
hiking:11063879:pwn:OCLM:Ortigueru - Canales - La Molina:no:::::::0
hiking:11063992:pwn:BI:Berodia - Inguanzo:no:::::::0
hiking:11064793:pwn:TA:Tielve - Arenas:no:::::::0
hiking:11068590:pwn:PBST:Poncebos - Bulnes - Sotres - Tielve:no:::::::0
hiking:11074845:pwn:AC:Arangas - Carreña:no:::::::0
hiking:11082491:pwn:PCP:Poo - Camarmeña - Poncebos:no:::::::0

.. are no longer on regular map with Elevate from next update on.

2 users thanked author for this post.

Tobias, Juanjo

[Author]

Posts